‘Neither Pakistan
nor the US
can afford to disengage, say experts’
While Pakistan
and the United States
have hit a rough patch in their relationship, neither side can afford to
disengage. This was the crux of a two-hour long roundtable at the Jinnah
Institute which looked at US-Pakistan relations and brought together some US officials
and some Pakistani experts including former military and foreign-service
officers.
The US
participants said that even after the US
withdrawal from Afghanistan ,
“we will remain involved in the region through other elements of national power
not only because US interests are tied in with this region but also because we
have friendly states here with which the US can constructively engage”.
Talking of Pakistani economy, a
leading Pakistani expert said that while the economic situation has been
stabilised, we have to ensure that we can sustain the upward trajectory and
must grow at the rate of 7 to 8 per cent for at least another 20 years, given other
indicators like our population growth rate and the demands it puts on the
economy.
Ejaz Haider, Executive Director
Jinnah Institute, who was moderating the discussion, agreed that a youth bulge
presented a security concern for Pakistan and that ‘compartmentalizing’ solutions would not
resolve these challenges. He also felt that evaluating Pak-US relations
required going beyond a discussion of the Afghan endgame and the tactical
concerns presented by it.
A former ambassador expressed
optimism about Pak-US relations in future as he felt the worst was over.
However, he felt there was an inability to read the American mind when it came
to the War on Terror. “There are contradictory narratives coming out of the US and it is difficult to say, on any given day,
what the American objectives are in the region,” he stated, adding that
security challenges in Afghanistan
added to worry and instability in Pakistan . He also pointed out that Pakistan ’s
deteriorating law and order situation and the rise of militant extremism
presented another grave challenge that hindered economic growth.
The Pakistani participants agreed
that the US withdrawal from
the region was the required solution in the short term and would help create
the space for Pakistan and Afghanistan to engage the US meaningfully to the advantage of all sides
when America ’s
military engagement in the region comes to an end.
The US
officials agreed that Washington ’s signals
have often not been consistent and conceded Pakistan ’s concerns on that score. A
leading Pakistani journalist talked about Pakistan ’s need to avoid
international isolation. He stated that in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks,
the Pakistani diaspora living in the US were alienated, when they could
have played a role in strengthening ties between the two countries. He also
pointed at the negative impressions about Pakistan
given in the mainstream American press, which not only distorts perceptions in
the US , but brings about
anti-American sentiment in Pakistan
also. One American official responded by saying that the US State Department
was making extensive efforts to dispel negative impressions about Pakistan by
engaging a cross section of the US population in dialogue, by connecting
entrepreneurs from both countries together and through reaching out the to the
Pakistani diaspora settled in the US. However, members of the delegation agreed
that the mainstream American media’s reportage about Pakistan provided cause for
concern.
Both sides agreed that Pakistani
parliament’s review would make a good basis for resetting the relationship by
clearly stating Pakistan ’s
concerns and priorities. “The relationship originally was configured in ways
that were not conducive to a frank discussion of convergences and divergences.
We now have an opportunity to be candid with each other,” noted Haider.
The roundtable was part of Jinnah
Institute’s initiatives in Track-II diplomacy, whose aim is to engage multiple
stakeholders in peace building and dialogue. JI was set up as a think tank in
2010 by Sherry Rehman, Pakistan’s current Ambassador to the US.
While Pakistan
and the United States
have hit a rough patch in their relationship, neither side can afford to
disengage. This was the crux of a two-hour long roundtable at the Jinnah
Institute which looked at US-Pakistan relations and brought together some US officials
and some Pakistani experts including former military and foreign-service
officers.
The US
participants said that even after the US
withdrawal from Afghanistan ,
“we will remain involved in the region through other elements of national power
not only because US interests are tied in with this region but also because we
have friendly states here with which the US can constructively engage”.
Talking of Pakistani economy, a
leading Pakistani expert said that while the economic situation has been
stabilised, we have to ensure that we can sustain the upward trajectory and
must grow at the rate of 7 to 8 per cent for at least another 20 years, given other
indicators like our population growth rate and the demands it puts on the
economy.
Ejaz Haider, Executive Director
Jinnah Institute, who was moderating the discussion, agreed that a youth bulge
presented a security concern for Pakistan and that ‘compartmentalizing’ solutions would not
resolve these challenges. He also felt that evaluating Pak-US relations
required going beyond a discussion of the Afghan endgame and the tactical
concerns presented by it.
A former ambassador expressed
optimism about Pak-US relations in future as he felt the worst was over.
However, he felt there was an inability to read the American mind when it came
to the War on Terror. “There are contradictory narratives coming out of the US and it is difficult to say, on any given day,
what the American objectives are in the region,” he stated, adding that
security challenges in Afghanistan
added to worry and instability in Pakistan . He also pointed out that Pakistan ’s
deteriorating law and order situation and the rise of militant extremism
presented another grave challenge that hindered economic growth.
The Pakistani participants agreed
that the US withdrawal from
the region was the required solution in the short term and would help create
the space for Pakistan and Afghanistan to engage the US meaningfully to the advantage of all sides
when America ’s
military engagement in the region comes to an end.
The US
officials agreed that Washington ’s signals
have often not been consistent and conceded Pakistan ’s concerns on that score. A
leading Pakistani journalist talked about Pakistan ’s need to avoid
international isolation. He stated that in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks,
the Pakistani diaspora living in the US were alienated, when they could
have played a role in strengthening ties between the two countries. He also
pointed at the negative impressions about Pakistan
given in the mainstream American press, which not only distorts perceptions in
the US , but brings about
anti-American sentiment in Pakistan
also. One American official responded by saying that the US State Department
was making extensive efforts to dispel negative impressions about Pakistan by
engaging a cross section of the US population in dialogue, by connecting
entrepreneurs from both countries together and through reaching out the to the
Pakistani diaspora settled in the US. However, members of the delegation agreed
that the mainstream American media’s reportage about Pakistan provided cause for
concern.
Both sides agreed that Pakistani
parliament’s review would make a good basis for resetting the relationship by
clearly stating Pakistan ’s
concerns and priorities. “The relationship originally was configured in ways
that were not conducive to a frank discussion of convergences and divergences.
We now have an opportunity to be candid with each other,” noted Haider.
The roundtable was part of Jinnah
Institute’s initiatives in Track-II diplomacy, whose aim is to engage multiple
stakeholders in peace building and dialogue. JI was set up as a think tank in
2010 by Sherry Rehman, Pakistan’s current Ambassador to the US.
No comments:
Post a Comment